crackhouserooster
TPF Noob!
- Joined
- Jan 8, 2020
- Messages
- 14
- Reaction score
- 2
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos NOT OK to edit
- Thread Starter 🔹
- #31
i don't miss waiting 40-70 mins for transparencies to make it through the kreonites. i remember Dicomed coming by the studio in '96 or so and trying to push their digital back. we had a set shot using 4x5 ektachrome 100 and compared it to what the rep could capture and there were no competition. the rep seemed a little embarrassed. from there we dabbled in d1x's for smaller format and ended up getting a few leaf 11mp backs (a mix of mamiya and sinar mounts, maybe one adapted to hasselblad too(?)) and they served us quite well for a few years. currently using a 5ds, mark iv, a couple of mark iii back up bodies and a sony a7r3. my personal system has been the Fuji xt series. currently on the 3. check out my personal website. schneider67.com. thanks for your replies.MRs have been seen recently being used as props. LOL. Seriously though at Cobalt Studios a rental Studio here in town they have a couple that people have been using as props in fashion and glamour sets.
I do not miss film very much, but I do miss seeing those big 4 x 5 inch 'chromes on a light table. The last time I shot any 4 x 5 Chrome was probably 1993.
With the upgrade in ISO quality during the digital age, my everyday flash power requirements have dropped dramatically. Still I have found that it makes life easier when you have more flash power than needed, and you can work at half power or quarter power and have nearly-instantaneous flash recycle time when using ISO 100 or 200 or even 320.
These are blessed times we live in. No more Ektachrome 64 for decent quality and quick turnaround...
Last edited: