Morpheuss
TPF Noob!
- Joined
- Jul 4, 2010
- Messages
- 596
- Reaction score
- 0
- Location
- South Carolina
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos OK to edit
the power lines are a little distracting
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
it says 18, plan to go pro at 20. Pro at what, exactly?
Do you not have anything better to do than to denigrate anyone who aspires to do better? I don't think I've read a single constructive critique from you. Just attacks.
Yes, it's unlikely they will become a professional photographer in two years. But it's a GOAL. Their supposed to be over ambitious. That's the point. To push yourself.
That said; Shuttercraft, I would recommend a less noisy background. Like others mentioned, the power lines pull your eyes away from the subject. Also, you might try a longer focal length to throw the background out of focus.
Do you not have anything better to do than to denigrate anyone who aspires to do better? I don't think I've read a single constructive critique from you. Just attacks.
Yes, it's unlikely they will become a professional photographer in two years. But it's a GOAL. Their supposed to be over ambitious. That's the point. To push yourself.
Man oh man not you again, Petraio Prime, Like LCARSx32 may have mentioned in different words, if you want to C&C do so, if you have nothing good to say or no advice to give, please take your rude comments elsewhere because they are definately not appreciated here. This forum is to HELP new photographers out by evolving their skills in this art. However it is NOT meant to push people into the ground with rude comments like the ones you have stated in previous threads.
That being said I think alot of these people here are arguing the same thing, a very noisy background. Thee is alot going on like the power lines and the shading effects, I think I know what you were trying to do. I love busy photos but thats just me so really I kind of like this photo. For portraits however you want to make the subject pop out of the image.
Hope some of this help, and good luck in the future.
There has to be some basis for starting. The photo looks very sloppy to me. Junk in the background, some kind of dodging poorly done.
I am just curious why the individual wants to "go pro" at 20. It takes years, if not decades to get really good and to build up a clientelle. The goal is unreasonable. In the photography business, there are too many wanna-be 'pros' already, and many excellent experienced pro who are starving because there's never enough work for them all. For these reasons I see no reason to encourage anyone to become a professional photographer, even those who are very good. Even if you're very good you'll likely starve.
it says 18, plan to go pro at 20. Pro at what, exactly?
Do you not have anything better to do than to denigrate anyone who aspires to do better? I don't think I've read a single constructive critique from you. Just attacks.
Yes, it's unlikely they will become a professional photographer in two years. But it's a GOAL. Their supposed to be over ambitious. That's the point. To push yourself.
That said; Shuttercraft, I would recommend a less noisy background. Like others mentioned, the power lines pull your eyes away from the subject. Also, you might try a longer focal length to throw the background out of focus.
Man oh man not you again, Petraio Prime, Like LCARSx32 may have mentioned in different words, if you want to C&C do so, if you have nothing good to say or no advice to give, please take your rude comments elsewhere because they are definately not appreciated here. This forum is to HELP new photographers out by evolving their skills in this art. However it is NOT meant to push people into the ground with rude comments like the ones you have stated in previous threads.
That being said I think alot of these people here are arguing the same thing, a very noisy background. Thee is alot going on like the power lines and the shading effects, I think I know what you were trying to do. I love busy photos but thats just me so really I kind of like this photo. For portraits however you want to make the subject pop out of the image.
Hope some of this help, and good luck in the future.
There has to be some basis for starting. The photo looks very sloppy to me. Junk in the background, some kind of dodging poorly done.
I am just curious why the individual wants to "go pro" at 20. It takes years, if not decades to get really good and to build up a clientelle. The goal is unreasonable. In the photography business, there are too many wanna-be 'pros' already, and many excellent experienced pro who are starving because there's never enough work for them all. For these reasons I see no reason to encourage anyone to become a professional photographer, even those who are very good. Even if you're very good you'll likely starve.
Then let them starve! If this guy has ambition, the drive, the motivation, who are you to say that he can't do it? If pro is considered being able to live off of the earnings you make from your photography, then hell I am almost pro because if i were to quit my job I can almost pay off my bills with what I make. Yes even with the so called "****ty" gear I have. This guy has his goal set out. He definately has his work cut out for him but that doesn't mean he wont be able to achieve his goal. Maybe where you are Prime the business is slow and dying. Here in Vancouver, wow son business is a boomin!
Seriously? Age hasn't been a limit since 2006, where have you been my friend? I myself am only 19. Who is to say thatby the time i'm 20, I won't be able to live of my work? Have you not watched other things going on in the world, there's a 14 year old chinese girl that is a world gymnastics champion, too young? Come on man, age should not be a standard by which we live, younger people are going to greater hights then the youth from the 80's or 90's could never reach. Get real.
Your so stubborn it's making me wnt to hit my monitor. You're not getting my point man, my point wasn't that photography is like gymnastics, my point is that age is not a limit or a requirment for professionalism anymore, it may have been back in 1980 but this is 2010! Seriously man get with the program. I don't see the 10,000 hours of anythign beign a fact anywhere. Where did you pull that random ass fact from? Because it stinks man. You don't reall yneed talent to be a pro, look at Sean Avery, (I hate him, therefore the reference). Oh and those 2 points are actually 3. Way to count though, guesing they didn't teach that back in 1854 huh?
I like how your slowly attempting to admit that what you said was completely uncalled for and made you sound like an idiot. Good attempt though. Key word being attempt.
it says 18, plan to go pro at 20. Pro at what, exactly?
it says 18, plan to go pro at 20. Pro at what, exactly?
Why do you come off to me as just being evil to your core? The photographer is only 18. Does your kid have a TPF account taking pictures so I can go rub some dirt in his/her face? I'm just sayin......
I like how your slowly attempting to admit that what you said was completely uncalled for and made you sound like an idiot. Good attempt though. Key word being attempt.
I sometimes revise my posts after I first put them on, because I think through it more. Don't reply immediately. It will probably change a little.
I know how you feel. I was 20 once. At that time I had already been doing photography for six years and was getting pretty good. I had no notion of going pro at that time, though I did work professionally in my late 20s and 30s. I worked at my college yearbook when I was 18-22 and did some rather good work of the PJ type. It was not, however, the best training for commercial photography, so when I tried working in the commercial photography field it was almost like starting from scratch.