Tim Tucker 2
No longer a newbie, moving up!
- Joined
- Jun 8, 2017
- Messages
- 333
- Reaction score
- 241
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos OK to edit
I know I'm late to this discussion but couldn't help but be drawn to this comment:
And I ask, what is it that makes you think that the context of the image was ever in the control of the photographer?
It never was. People interpret images in terms of their own experience, understanding and prejudice. Photographers have never been able to capture the absolute of a moment and lock it inside a frame where it is fixed and seen as an immovable absolute by all viewers. This is a basic understanding with all photography.
The problem with a lot of street photography today is social media. It is a culture of "look at me" of how *I* captured this moment that only *I* see. A lot of the time, with the explosion of *street* on social media I get the message that we are celebrating the *photographer's eye* and not gaining a deeper understanding of the nature of being human. It has moved away from this in search of the celebration of *self*. In the days of film, pre-internet, images that were published had to pass the scrutiny of editors who culled images, who looked after the editorial brief of their bosses and the advertisers who paid them. They published what they believed was of interest to those being photographed rather than the ones doing the photography. It is a reversal of intent that seems to be largely missed by many street photographers of today as their aim seems to be one of their own self promotion. Which is quite the opposite of the original street photography and why those being photographed found it interesting.
Perception is everything, and because people view with prejudice then they will invariably side with the point of view that fits their purpose. And if that is more isolationist and they are more willing to believe that *all* street photography is just social media wannabes looking for their 15mins of fame then we only have human nature to blame. Which incidentally is what street photography was originally a window for us to see and reflect on.
Should we blame the audience for not understanding us, or ourselves for not understanding the audience?
Just my opinion...
the context of images can be interpreted in any way that is out of the control of the photographer
And I ask, what is it that makes you think that the context of the image was ever in the control of the photographer?
It never was. People interpret images in terms of their own experience, understanding and prejudice. Photographers have never been able to capture the absolute of a moment and lock it inside a frame where it is fixed and seen as an immovable absolute by all viewers. This is a basic understanding with all photography.
The problem with a lot of street photography today is social media. It is a culture of "look at me" of how *I* captured this moment that only *I* see. A lot of the time, with the explosion of *street* on social media I get the message that we are celebrating the *photographer's eye* and not gaining a deeper understanding of the nature of being human. It has moved away from this in search of the celebration of *self*. In the days of film, pre-internet, images that were published had to pass the scrutiny of editors who culled images, who looked after the editorial brief of their bosses and the advertisers who paid them. They published what they believed was of interest to those being photographed rather than the ones doing the photography. It is a reversal of intent that seems to be largely missed by many street photographers of today as their aim seems to be one of their own self promotion. Which is quite the opposite of the original street photography and why those being photographed found it interesting.
Perception is everything, and because people view with prejudice then they will invariably side with the point of view that fits their purpose. And if that is more isolationist and they are more willing to believe that *all* street photography is just social media wannabes looking for their 15mins of fame then we only have human nature to blame. Which incidentally is what street photography was originally a window for us to see and reflect on.
Should we blame the audience for not understanding us, or ourselves for not understanding the audience?
Just my opinion...