70to210mmf4
TPF Noob!
- Joined
- Jun 27, 2019
- Messages
- 53
- Reaction score
- 3
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos NOT OK to edit
The lamp in my enlarger has blown and I need to replace it. Are they all the same? Can I just get any one I find on ebay or do I need to get one specific to my enlarger? I have a Durst.
Where are you located?
If in the US, a PH-211 75w bulb should work.
Although if you are looking at that 230v Paterson bulb, it does not seem that you are in the US.
The Durst illuminates from the side of the bulb, so you have to adjust the vertical position of the bulb to give you even illumination on the baseboard.
I find it odd that it would be named RS 35 when it can handle 70x70 film.
Yes I will try it. I'm just worried that I'm going to blow something up or electrocute myself.well, I would try the Patterson bulb and see how it works for you.
That's good to know. The manual does say to twist the bulb to get it even, but I hadn't thought of moving it up and down too. Thanks.Where are you located?
The Durst illuminates from the side of the bulb, so you have to adjust the vertical position of the bulb to give you even illumination on the baseboard.
Where are you located?
If in the US, a PH-211 75w bulb should work.
Although if you are looking at that 230v Paterson bulb, it does not seem that you are in the US.
The Durst illuminates from the side of the bulb, so you have to adjust the vertical position of the bulb to give you even illumination on the baseboard.
I find it odd that it would be named RS 35 when it can handle 70x70 film.
I'm in Australia. I think 70x70 is the size of the colour filters it accepts, not the size of the negatives.
The RS-35 looks somewhat like the M600. So what follows is based on my M600.
The bulb screws into the M600 from the top.
Below the head, there is a tube-like assembly where the power cord goes into the head. The top of this assembly is where you screw the bulb into.
Twisting that tube-assembly lets me push/pull, to adjust the vertical position of the bulb in the head. The tube assembly is friction fit/not threaded, twisting it just makes it easier for me to move it up/down.
If the manual says to twist it. The assembly might be threaded, rather than friction.
View attachment 179274
The Durst illuminates from the side of the bulb, so you have to adjust the vertical position of the bulb to give you even illumination on the baseboard.
The PH-211 is a 120v bulb.
Worst case, look for a 75 watt, WHITE bulb, without any printing on the side.
Although if it prints too short, you might look for a lower wattage bulb. A 75 watt bulb in my M600 results in an exposure less than 10 seconds, which is almost too short. I wanted to get a 40 watt bulb, but they don't make a photo bulb that low.
The RS-35 looks somewhat like the M600. So what follows is based on my M600.
The bulb screws into the M600 from the top.
Below the head, there is a tube-like assembly where the power cord goes into the head. The top of this assembly is where you screw the bulb into.
Twisting that tube-assembly lets me push/pull, to adjust the vertical position of the bulb in the head. The tube assembly is friction fit/not threaded, twisting it just makes it easier for me to move it up/down.
If the manual says to twist it. The assembly might be threaded, rather than friction.
View attachment 179274
The Durst illuminates from the side of the bulb, so you have to adjust the vertical position of the bulb to give you even illumination on the baseboard.
The PH-211 is a 120v bulb.
Worst case, look for a 75 watt, WHITE bulb, without any printing on the side.
Although if it prints too short, you might look for a lower wattage bulb. A 75 watt bulb in my M600 results in an exposure less than 10 seconds, which is almost too short. I wanted to get a 40 watt bulb, but they don't make a photo bulb that low.
The bulb that blew out was one that came with the enlarger. It's clear and has RADIO ARGON 130/60 printed on the base. Does that mean it's 60 watts? On the two test strips I managed to make before the bulb went out, 2 seconds at f/8 made the print WAY too dark which I think means either the globe was too bright or I stuffed up something myself (which is very very likely).