Timppa
No longer a newbie, moving up!
- Joined
- Dec 15, 2016
- Messages
- 385
- Reaction score
- 188
- Location
- Finland
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos NOT OK to edit
Ok, So I'm a Nikon user, I know pretty much most of all the gear from and for nikon, the differences in bodies, lenses, etc...
But I'm a bit lost with Canon .
How do there series add up ? What is like the equal to a D7200/D500 or D750/D810/D5 ?
I also noticed there is a 51mpix camera , Is that then the equal to the D810?
And how do I know when a lens is made for DX? with Nikon it says... DX. Does it say on canon to? Or did I just miss it every time I read information about it ? xD
Maybe something in my brain doesn't understand Canon -.-'
The thing is, I love wildlife and landscape! Currently I have this:
Tamron 16-300 (I love it for travel, but I'm missing quality so much >.<)
D7100 (Great camera, but i would love more fps and better noise handling, its pretty bad at it :/)
Nikkor 200-500, Love it.
I used to have the Tokina 11-16, but sold it so I could get another uwa (like the new tamron 10-24 for example), But so far something inside of me told me not to buy it yet, plus its 700€ in Finland >.<.
Anyway, I started to get concerned latelty :3. Me and my wife love to travel. And I'm concerned about taking the 200-500 everywhere.
I also would like to upgrade from the D7100 to something else and replace the Tamron with a great wide angle lens. I had many ideas in my mind from having a DX with zoom for wildlife while travelling and a FX with a nikkor 16-35 or something.
This way I can put the 16-35 also on the DX and get a bit closer if needed, or put the wildlife zoom on the FX, etc... So many ideas o_o
Since my wife really seems the love Canon, every since she had a small compact camera from 10 years ago, I was wondering to just check the Canon market out there. I'm not saying I will make the switch, but it would be great to be informed and learn more about it.
I also like the fact (that many people seem to dislike), that Canon has 1.6 cropfacter instead of 1.5.
It means I can get a little closer again with a zoomlens.
A perfect match would be something like a 14-35 lens F2.8 or F.4 that I can use on FX or DX (making it a 22-56),
and a 100-300 lens FX F2.8 or F.4 that would be a 160-480 on a DX.
(All of this together reaching 14 up to 56 and 100 up to 480).
..and all of this for an attractive price... Is canon cheaper than Nikon? Or about the same?
wooh, lots of questions, don't have to answer them all . Main info about the differences in Canon would be already a great help, and I can do the rest of research myself then. Just wanted to give the whole story^^
Thanks!
But I'm a bit lost with Canon .
How do there series add up ? What is like the equal to a D7200/D500 or D750/D810/D5 ?
I also noticed there is a 51mpix camera , Is that then the equal to the D810?
And how do I know when a lens is made for DX? with Nikon it says... DX. Does it say on canon to? Or did I just miss it every time I read information about it ? xD
Maybe something in my brain doesn't understand Canon -.-'
The thing is, I love wildlife and landscape! Currently I have this:
Tamron 16-300 (I love it for travel, but I'm missing quality so much >.<)
D7100 (Great camera, but i would love more fps and better noise handling, its pretty bad at it :/)
Nikkor 200-500, Love it.
I used to have the Tokina 11-16, but sold it so I could get another uwa (like the new tamron 10-24 for example), But so far something inside of me told me not to buy it yet, plus its 700€ in Finland >.<.
Anyway, I started to get concerned latelty :3. Me and my wife love to travel. And I'm concerned about taking the 200-500 everywhere.
I also would like to upgrade from the D7100 to something else and replace the Tamron with a great wide angle lens. I had many ideas in my mind from having a DX with zoom for wildlife while travelling and a FX with a nikkor 16-35 or something.
This way I can put the 16-35 also on the DX and get a bit closer if needed, or put the wildlife zoom on the FX, etc... So many ideas o_o
Since my wife really seems the love Canon, every since she had a small compact camera from 10 years ago, I was wondering to just check the Canon market out there. I'm not saying I will make the switch, but it would be great to be informed and learn more about it.
I also like the fact (that many people seem to dislike), that Canon has 1.6 cropfacter instead of 1.5.
It means I can get a little closer again with a zoomlens.
A perfect match would be something like a 14-35 lens F2.8 or F.4 that I can use on FX or DX (making it a 22-56),
and a 100-300 lens FX F2.8 or F.4 that would be a 160-480 on a DX.
(All of this together reaching 14 up to 56 and 100 up to 480).
..and all of this for an attractive price... Is canon cheaper than Nikon? Or about the same?
wooh, lots of questions, don't have to answer them all . Main info about the differences in Canon would be already a great help, and I can do the rest of research myself then. Just wanted to give the whole story^^
Thanks!