What's new

What image size should I shoot in?

Joined
Aug 27, 2012
Messages
2,289
Reaction score
661
Location
Orlando, FL
Can others edit my Photos
Photos OK to edit
When I am just messing around I normally take photos in the 1600X1200 setting. Is this the right thing to do?

If I think there is a chance of my making an 8 by 10 photo or an even bigger print from my picture should I raise my image size to 3264x2448?

Why would I have use the 4608x3456 ( 16m )?

Will my image quality be better if I crop an image depending on what image size I took the photo at originally? ( Say 1600x1200 compared to 3264x2448 )?

Thank you for your help!
 
Shoot raw then you can do what you want with the image
 
Shoot in the largest size. Don't restrict your file size right from the start. You can always resize at the end.
 
Shoot in the largest size. Don't restrict your file size right from the start. You can always resize at the end.

+when you resize from the largest file size, you will have many more pixels to work with, thus crops will be higher quality.
 
My camera does not have RAW, so that is not an option, sorry I should have said that upfront I guess.

You guys are saying to shoot the largest, however if I do that, and I resize the picture for the forum or for facebook or something, wont the compression show up more if I started at 16m and go all the way down to 800x600?


When I upload to flickr and share, I choose medium which is 640x480.
 
As mentioned.. shoot in the largest, highest quality you have... that will give you the maximum amount of image quality to work with, and let you do what you want with it.
 
I agree with the others. As far as I'm concerned my cameras only have one size setting: The largest I can get out of it.
 
When I am just messing around I normally take photos in the 1600X1200 setting. Is this the right thing to do?

If I think there is a chance of my making an 8 by 10 photo or an even bigger print from my picture should I raise my image size to 3264x2448?

Why would I have use the 4608x3456 ( 16m )?

Will my image quality be better if I crop an image depending on what image size I took the photo at originally? ( Say 1600x1200 compared to 3264x2448 )?

Thank you for your help!
For online or electronic display the image pixel dimensions are the image resolution, but also note that few web sites can display images at full resolution.
Cropping means discarding pixels. Fewer pixels means less image resolution. It is a good idea to avoid cropping whenever possible.

When you start referring to print sizes, like 8 inches x 10 inches you have to consider image pixel dimensions relative to resolution (as defined by pixels-per-inch or ppi) and the image aspect ratio.

Most DSLR cameras make images that have a 3:2 aspect ratio. An 8x10 print has a 5:4 aspect ratio. So some portion of a 3:2 image has to be cropped away to make an 8x10 print.
You have 1600 x 1200 pixel images, which is a 4:3 aspect ratio. 3264x2448 and 4608x3456 are also 4:3 aspect ratio pixel dimensions.

We can deduce that your 4:3 aspect ratio images have a long side that is 1.33333 times longer than the short side (4/3= 1.333), while 5:4 has a long side that is only 1.25 times longer than the short side (5/4= 1.25).

Using a 1600x1200 image as a start we can calculate how many pixels have to be cropped from the long side of a 4:3 to get to 5:4 - 1200 x 1.25 = 1500.
1600 px -1500 px = 100 pixels that have to be crop from the long side of a 1600x1200 image to print an 8x10.
Next we need some simple algebraic related math equations:

Pixels divided by pixels-per-inch = Inches
Inches divided by pixels = Pixels-per-inch
Inches times pixels-per-inch = Pixels

To print a 1500 x 1200 image as an 8x10 we use Inches divided by pixels = Pixels-per-inch to get 1500 px/10" = 150 ppi. As a check we can do 1200 px/8" = 150 ppi to verify the resolution is the same for both sides of the image.

How much print resolution is needed (pixels-per-inch) relative to print quality is dependent on a number of factors - print size, image quality, viewing distance, etc.

Many online print labs have minimum ppi (resolution) requirements, usually at or near 100 ppi. No doubt, the higher the print resolution (ppi) the better.
 
Last edited:
^ Wow, okay. My head hurts from reading that. If I understood that correctly, your saying Pluto is not a planet anymore? j/k You are saying to make 8x10 images you would go higher than 1600x1200 so I dont have to lose pixels? So you would at least shoot at 2272x1704 which is my next highest image size?
 
Shoot the largest pixel count, highest quality that's available.

The ONLY time I will shoot at anything less is when I know for 100% certain that I will NEVER want to do anything more with an image other than what I'm shooting it for. For instance, a big storm is moving in right now and my folks in Texas are wondering what the weather is like. I'll set the camera to Small/Basic JPEG and fire off a 800x530 pixel in an email. Past that, the image is deleted.
 
Some labs adjust image size and some do not
 
All those numbers are just part of the information needed to make, or have made, high quality prints.
Tutorials on Color Management & Printing
Print presentation and how presentation methods/materials relate to print quality longevity is an art in and of itself.

Most print labs use print device RIP (Raster Image Processing) software that will automatically resize and/or crop until that lab's lower PPI limit is reached.

Note that some chromogenic print devices have an upper resolution limit (starting at about 250 PPI), so exceeding the print device's limit is a waste.
 
Last edited:

Most reactions

Back
Top Bottom