webestang64
Been spending a lot of time on here!
- Joined
- May 15, 2013
- Messages
- 3,074
- Reaction score
- 2,086
- Location
- St. Louis, MO. USA
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos NOT OK to edit
Sorry I mentioned it. Jeesh.
I had that same camera ands loved it. But a nephew went pro and all he had was a 35mm so I gave my 645 to him. It got great photo's. had an RB 67 at the same time and preferred the 645.I finished the roll that was in the camera after taking 7 or 8 shots with it and had it developed and scanned. The photos of my brother with his dog look to be about 5 years old and looked good although my brother was slightly out of focus where the dog was sharp. The photos I took were all kind of washed out. I'm thinking the film got too old but the photos already on it were OK? It was Ektar 100 film. I put a roll of Portra 400 in it but I haven't shot anything yet. I'll give this roll a chance.
I did some auto-correct in Apple Photos and they look a bit better. I'll have to learn how to use the computer tools. There's a full copy of Photoshop and Lightroom on another computer in my house. Maybe I should give those a try too.
I own 20 film cameras that shoot 35mm, and I've 3 that shoot 120; plus digitals. My first choice when shooting anymore(and I often carry 3 different cameras) is my 120's, unless it's a too distant object for the lens. The color(I only shoot color), clarity and depth of those shots is beyond anything I can do with the 35's....It's not opinion, it's science. The Mamiya is an excellent camera....enjoy.Why is that too bad? That film seems to be plentiful and I get 16 shots per roll of 120, 32 of 220. It is possible to get a digital back for the camera too, but they are very expensive for someone that doesn't even know what to do with it. I thought the film would be expensive, but so far I'm not finding it to be terribly expensive, not considering how little I'm likely to use it.
My adult kids are all coming to the house today, and it is a sunny day. That sounds like an opportunity to take some family shots.
I too saw that first, but when I saw mention of 127 film I read the text...What 127-film cameras? All I see is a Mamiya 645.
This is why, OVER A YEAR AGO, @webestang64 made the comment about the availability of 127 film. There has been needless confusion about this.There were also two 127 film cameras, but I found out that the film is basically unavailable for those.