K9Kirk
Been spending a lot of time on here!
- Joined
- Feb 15, 2019
- Messages
- 15,342
- Reaction score
- 10,004
- Location
- Central Florida (Ruskin area)
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos NOT OK to edit
This may be the proverbial dumb question here so bear with me. A friend of mine and I were discussing camera video which lead to us wondering which has a longer shutter life for videos, a dslr or a camcorder that's made specifically for video. We thought that maybe a camcorders shutter would have a longer life expectancy since it's made specifically for video but that didn't settle with me.
Needless to say, we never came to a definite conclusion so I researched it but came up empty. Since the conversation my logic has me leaning toward the belief that if companies wanted their cameras to compete with camcorders they wouldn't use inferior parts or technology and would make their cameras video parts, (shutter) etc. equal to or better than a camcorders or am I wrong? Is there something I'm not seeing and considering? My research gives me nothing to go on so I'm guessing at best. I know most differences between the two so I'm not concerned with other differences.
So, the question is … *Does one have a much longer shutter life than the other?
Thanks for your time!
Needless to say, we never came to a definite conclusion so I researched it but came up empty. Since the conversation my logic has me leaning toward the belief that if companies wanted their cameras to compete with camcorders they wouldn't use inferior parts or technology and would make their cameras video parts, (shutter) etc. equal to or better than a camcorders or am I wrong? Is there something I'm not seeing and considering? My research gives me nothing to go on so I'm guessing at best. I know most differences between the two so I'm not concerned with other differences.
So, the question is … *Does one have a much longer shutter life than the other?
Thanks for your time!